Category Archives: Drugs

US Supreme Court Rejects Florida Drug Testing Appeal

Phillip Smith
Stop The Drug War: April 21, 2014

The US Supreme Court Monday declined to review a lower court ruling that found Florida Gov. Rick Scott’s (R) plan to randomly drug test state employees unconstitutional.

The decision by the nation’s highest court means that the ruling by the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals finding the plan unconstitutional stands.

The drug test-happy governor had issued an executive order in March 2011 directing all state agencies to drug test new hires and randomly test current employees. But that order was challenged by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 79, representing state workers.

The union argued that random drug testing was a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s proscription against unreasonable searches and seizures. In its decision, the 11th Circuit generally agreed with the union, finding the suspicion-less drug tests unconstitutional, but also ordered the state and the union to determine which state employees could be subjected to such testing.

(Read the full article at Stop The Drug War)

—-
Alternative Free Press -fair use-

Jesus would end the war on drugs

Christian leaders issue Easter statement denouncing drug war and mass incarceration of minorities

By Alfonso Serrano
Aljazeera: April 17, 2014

A coalition of Christian leaders, citing the spirit of Holy Week, has called for an end to mass incarceration in the United States. The ministry of Jesus Christ, they say, was about challenging the unjust systems that held marginalized communities in bondage. And they equate that struggle with the fight against the war on drugs, which not only costs billions of dollars, they say, but also results in the disproportionate incarceration of minorities.

“We are called upon to follow Jesus’s example in opposing the war on drugs, which has resulted in the United States becoming the world’s biggest jailer, with about 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s prisoners,” the Rev. Edwin Sanders, senior servant and founder of the Metropolitan Interdenominational Church in Nashville, Tenn., said in a statement.

The Christian leaders on Wednesday called on the federal government to repeal laws that criminalize low-level drug possession — policies that result in disparate incarceration rates for blacks and Hispanics, studies show. In their place, the federal government should expand drug treatment and other health approaches to drug use, the coalition members said.

The Christian leaders urged Congress to pass the Smarter Sentencing Act. The measure, supported by the Obama administration, would reduce mandatory minimum sentences for some drug offenders and apply more lenient crack cocaine sentencing policies. The House Judiciary Committee is weighing the bill, after the Senate Judiciary Committee approved it in January.

The recommendations come amid growing mainstream criticism of the U.S. criminal justice system. States spent $3.6 billion in 2010 alone enforcing marijuana possession laws, according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union. The same study found that blacks are 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession that whites with similar usage rates. In areas with the most heightened detention disparities, blacks are 30 times more likely to be arrested.

“The policies of this failed war on drugs, which in reality is a war on people who happen to be poor, primarily black and brown, is a stain on the image of this society,” said the Rev. John E. Jackson, a member of Chicago’s Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference of progressive African-American faith leaders, during a teleconference on Wednesday with a half-dozen religious leaders.

(Read the full article at Aljazeera)

—-
Alternative Free Press – fair use –

Toronto’s Public EDM Ban Is A Giant Corporate Welfare Handout

Toronto Just Banned Electronic Dance Music Concerts on its Public Grounds

by: Ryan Krahn
Vice: April 14, 2014

Friday morning, Toronto (supposedly the world’s ‘most youthful city’) banned electronic dance music concerts from the Direct Energy and Better Living buildings on its public grounds, Exhibition Place. Exhibition Place, also known as The Ex, is a publicly owned space located by Toronto’s western waterfront, far away from any residential housing, which hosts an annual fair and often rents out their space for concerts of all genres. In the past, these events have included some of the biggest names to ever hit the sync button: Tiësto, Avicii and Laidback Luke.

The shutdown comes at the behest of Zlatko Starkovski, owner of suburbanite DUI destination, Muzik Nightclub. In the middle of January, Zlatko started worrying about the kids, particularly, the ones dancing across the street from his club. After all, there’s something less impressive about a 3000-person mega club with its own free beauty salon when the seats are empty because everyone’s watching Avicii DJ hands-free over at the 10,000-seater next door. So, Zlatko decided to write the city to tell on these kids. Well, first he donated a couple thousand dollars to mayor Rob Ford’s 2010 campaign. And he hired the powerful Sussex lobbying firm too. And then he wrote the letter.

The letter starts off with the outright admission that “competing events in the Better Living Centre and the Direct Energy Centre…has caused Muzik problems in booking the talent for our own shows,” before gears are switched and a moral argument is launched against these “problem rave events,” with their drugs and underage drinking.

While this complaint was sliding its way through the right channels, Zlatko, known to Ford simply by the nickname ‘Z,’ invited the mayor to check out his club and the mayor obliged. And eventually the letter slid right into the hands of Ford’s sidekick, Councillor Mammoliti, who introduced the motion to have electronic music banned from these venues.

Before the motion passed four to three, Z and his lobbyist wheeled out the usual rave bogeyman tropes I remember seeing on daytime television in the late ’90s: kids raiding their parents’ medicine cabinets for scripts to take at the show, pedophiles on the prowl, eight to nine year old ravers (as if Toronto was actually Gabber Holland)! Mammo asked the committee to think of the children “taking ecstasy on government lands owned by the taxpayers” and worried that it was “wrong to be sending that message.” (A refresher: moralist Mammo is the guy who proposed a Red Light District on the Toronto Island and was the very last man defending the mayor amidst his crack scandal). Of course, the irony of it all is that the reason Exhibition Place started hosting dance music events in the first place was due to a Toronto Public Health recommendation that suggested it was the safest, most regulated place to do so. (And by our count, more people have died at Muzik than at any rave at Exhibition Place). Councillor Gord Perks, who opposed the motion, remarked that such a move would mean the loss of a “safe, well-monitored venue for young people and all-ages events and drive them back to the underground where it is really dangerous.” Mammo replied by calling him ‘Councillor Perks-ocet.’

After all of this conflation between drugs, death, and dance music, Mammo finally got to the real point: “If the private industry wants to have [EDM concerts] in a private location then so be it.” And these were the stakes, because the big twist is that Muzik plays (albeit currently to fewer people) the same mainstream EDM that they sold to the committee as dangerous. So, the city sold off its ostensibly bad investment right back to Muzik. As Z’s letter admits,

“Muzik, currently operates with a liquor license that has a capacity of 8,755. This encompasses 5,674 people outside in addition to the 3,081-person capacity inside our venue. However, our current lease has an exclusive use clause for events up to 2,999 people. By increasing this to reflect our actual capacity that we are licensed for, it would provide the necessary protection for these type of one off situations, and will give Muzik Clubs the protection it requires to ensure that our business remains successful.”

The TL;DR is that Muzik wanted to start a moral panic around dance music to shut down concerts at Exhibition Place, so that it could start hosting its own 9000-person EDM concerts on the same premises. That means their competitors, Live Nation or INK, will have to find other places, but this isn’t as much the issue as the fact that approximately one million dollars of lost revenue per year will be moving from the public purse into private hands, and at the cost of further vilifying the name of dance music.

Councillor Perks told THUMP that “Muzik, which is very politically connected, simply wants to get exclusive control of music events on Exhibition Place grounds. So they pretended to be for the welfare of young people, but instead, all they’re interested in is their own bottom line. They want to expand to have exclusive rights.” The councillor emphasized that the board that made the final decision “only exists because the city established it, so I need to figure out what tools city council has to bring the board back into a more sound harm reduction approach… Several of us on the council are just not going to let this go. We’ll figure out a way.”

(Read the full article at Vice)

—-
Alternative Free Press

Can Hemp, Marijuana and Mushrooms Fix Fukushima? The Solution

Can Hemp, Marijuana and Mushrooms Fix Fukushima? Part 5: The Solution

By David Malmo-Levine
Cannabis Culture: April 11, 2014

Hemp, cannabis and mushrooms can be used to clean up and protect us from radioactive pollution and nuclear disasters.

Read “Part 1: What Happened?”.

Read “Part 2: Global Consequences”.

Read “Part 3: The Dangers of Nuclear Power”.

Read “Part 4: Other Sources of Dangerous Radiation”.

Part 5 of this multi-article work looks at the surprising solutions to the growing nuclear threat to humankind.

The true economies of the nuclear industry are never fully accounted for. The cost of uranium enrichment is subsidized by the US government. The true cost of the industry’s liability in the case of an accident in the US is estimated to be $US 560 billion ($726 billion), but the industry pays only $US 9.1billion – 98 per cent of the insurance liability is covered by the US federal government. The cost of decommissioning all the existing US nuclear reactors is estimated to be $US 33billion. These costs – plus the enormous expense involved in the storage of radioactive waste for a quarter of a million years – are not now included in the economic assessments of nuclear electricity.

– “Nuclear Power is the Problem, Not a Solution”, Dr. Helen Caldicott, April 15, 2005 (236)

We should do everything in our power to make all nuclear facilities safe and secure. We should also start seriously working on the production of the alternative sources of energy.

– Mikhail Gorbachev, 2006 (237)

Action doesn’t disappear. Once you take a step, the next step is made from the previous step. It takes you to the new place. Emotion takes your effort to recall but action lets you forget your past. Emotion never take you anywhere, you never forget you felt something, but you cannot remember the taste. You are stuck in the jail of the memory. Emotion is the matter only in your mind. Action is the matter in reality. Let your action change your way.

– Mochizuki, Fukushima Diary (238)

[…]

Estimates of the cost of cleaning up the Chernobyl nuclear disaster are in the $250 to $300 billion range. (239) Imagine how many renewable power plants that would buy. Hundreds. Maybe thousands.

When evaluating the true cost effectiveness of nuclear power, one must be aware of the hidden costs: research and development, direct subsidies, decommissioning costs and the potential clean-up costs.

Each Japanese nuclear power plant costs the Japanese people about $238 million CAN per plant per year in R&D (about $10.7 billion CAN per plant over 45 years for a grand total of about $235 billion in R&D for all 22 of Japan’s nuclear reactors over 45 years), (240) about $26 million CAN per plant per year in direct subsidies (about $1.17 billion total per plant over 45 years, for a grand total of $25.7 billion for all 22 reactors over 45 years), (241) $400 million to $1 billion US per plant decommissioning cost (for a grand total of $8.8 billion to $22 billion to decommission all 22 reactors), (242) and potential damage cleanup costs of $25 to $150 billion (or more) CAN per disaster (243) – the vast majority of such cost taken on by taxpayers.

When all costs are factored in, the total subsidies over the course of 45 years for all 22 reactors is a staggering amount – anywhere from $294.5 billion (235 + 25.7 + 8.8 + 25 billion) to $3.58 trillion or more (235 + 25.7 + 22 + 3,300 billion) for all of Japan’s nuclear power plants together, depending on how many more of them get hit with disasters, and how big the disasters are.

To put this in perspective, the high-estimate cost of cleaning up 5 Fukushima-like disasters is about the same cost to Germany of transforming it’s entire energy grid to renewable energy – around $750 billion. (244) These numbers are on par with the massive subsidies given to fossil fuels, directly and in the costs of oil wars, oil spill clean-up and climate change. These costs are also said to be in the 100’s of billions, if not trillions. (245)

Unlike nuclear power and fossil fuels, the “clean-up” and “decommissioning” costs of renewable energy is negligible. Nobody dies prematurely of some horrible renewable-energy-related cancer. The soil surrounding renewable energy plants can be used to grow food. Both nuclear AND fossil fuel subsidies should be transformed into renewable energy subsidies. Now … what sort of renewable energy power plants could Japan get for $294.5 billion? Or $3.58 trillion for that matter? 

Shopping Around For Different Energy Systems

Small solar, wind, micro-hydro or geothermal energy systems designed for individual homes can run between about $10 and $50 thousand each. That, combined with energy conservation practices, can supply energy to between 6 to 30 million households for $300 billion, or 60 to 300 million households for $3 trillion. Japan’s entire population is only 127 million. The solar systems, for example, are expected to pay for themselves in 3 to 14 years, and last 25 to 30 years. (246) While more expensive over-all than mega-projects, the mini-projects have the added bonus of being income-generators for the millions of owners.

On the other end of the size scale, the world’s largest solar power project – the Agua Caliente Solar Project – will take about 4 years to complete (it will be completed some time in 2014), costs 1.8 billion dollars to make and will supply a maximum capacity of 397 megawatts (397 million watts) at one time – or over 626 gigawatts (626 billion watts) per year. (247) The average US home uses about 11 thousand kilowatts per year, (248) Which means, for 1.8 billion, one major solar project can supply power to nearly 57 million homes. 300 billion can provide for 166 major solar projects – power to 9.5 billion homes. At this point it should be pointed out that there aren’t even 9.5 billion people – let alone 9.5 billion homes – on planet earth.

Just slightly less amazing is wind power. The largest wind farm in the world is the Alta Wind Energy Center. It’s forecasted annual generation is between 306 and 552 gigawatts, (249) and it’s price tag is about 1.85 billion dollars, and it’s taken about three years to build – construction began in 2010. (250)

Less massive but still much cleaner and safer than nuclear energy and fossil fuels is geothermal. The largest geothermal power plant in the world is The Geysers. Built in 1960, it served 1.8 million people with power back in 1987, and currently serves 1.1 million people with power. (251) Some geothermal operations, such as the Svartsengi Power Station in Iceland, also provides a massive heated pool – the “Blue Lagoon” – to bathe and swim in. (252)

The world’s largest wave farm is being built off the coast of Scotland, at a cost of £4 million ($6.34 million CDN). (253) Once completed, it should be big enough to power 30,000 homes each year. (254) The advantage to wave power is that it’s located near most of the people on earth (who live near the coast) and it’s constant – the sun doesn’t always shine, the wind doesn’t always blow, but waves hit the shore 24/7/365, thanks to the moon. $300 billion buys 47,318 massive wave farms – enough to power nearly 1.42 billion homes. $3 trillion buys over 473 thousand wave farms – enough to power over 14 billion homes.

Tank Goodness For Hemp Ethanol

Solar, wind, geothermal and wave are fine for feeding energy grids, but what should we be running our cars on? And what else besides wave energy can provide energy 24/7/365 regardless of the weather? The cheapest source of energy to replace oil and gas with – one that only requires a $270 to $700 dollar conversion kit to switch any gas powered car over (255) – is the switch to cellulosic ethanol. For just $200 million, a facility can be made that produces 30 million gallons per year of cellulosic ethanol. (256) The US currently consumes about 134 billion gallons of gas per year. (257) For $300 billion, one could afford to make 1500 cellulosic ethanol plants, producing a grand total of 45 billion gallons of ethanol. For $3 trillion, one could afford to make 15,000 plants producing 450 billion gallons.

As luck would have it, the best source of cellulose from an energy crop is … industrial hemp.

Hemp:

1) doesn’t need as much fertilizer or water as corn, switchgrass or other energy crops

2) doesn’t require the expensive drying required of corn and sugar cane

3) can be grown where other energy crops can’t

4) is more resistant to “adverse fall weather” than other crops and

5) has long been known to be the lowest-moisture highest-cellulose crop – hemp stalks being “over 75% cellulose” according to a 1929 paper from Schafer and Simmonds, with more conservative estimates indicating 53-74% of the bark being cellulose.

According to the Stanford Research Institute and the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, it is woody, low-moisture herbaceous plants that make the best biomass for liquid fuels. Hemp is both a low moisture herbaceous and a woody plant. (258)

Furthermore, hemp ethanol would eliminate

1) oil wars (hemp can grow in sand, thus in nearly every country on earth), (259)

2) oil spills (a hemp ethanol spill would just evaporate), (260) and

3) climate destabilization (hemp acts as a carbon sink – reversing the greenhouse effect) (261) – this would solve three of the biggest problems we face as a species.

Imagine The Savings

Think of what we could do with the money we save! Just add up the cost of the two biggest current oil wars (Afghanistan and Iraq): $1.5 trillion, (262) the cost of cleaning up a couple of big oil spills: $80 billion, (263) and the costs of dealing with climate destabilization – an average of $20 billion or so per year for each year between 2020 and 2050 – or roughly $600 billion total for Canada. (264) The US being 10 times bigger, one could expect the costs to be ten times greater, or $6 trillion dollars over a 30-year period.

So we take that $8-or-so trillion of future money wasted on the fossil fuel industries and add it to the $3-or-so trillion from the over-all nuclear power-related costs including the cost of cleaning up a possible future two dozen “level 7” nuclear power plant disasters in earthquake-prone Japan, and instead of doing all that we instead spend the $11 trillion on solar, wind, geothermal, wave and hemp ethanol, we’d be doing alright as a species.

I daresay we would solve our energy problem 3 times over. Those are far from hard numbers, but I think I made my point.

But that’s just the energy problem. We still have all this radiation pollution lying around everywhere. What are we to do about that? Hemp and mushrooms, that’s what!

Cleaning Up The Soil Part 1 – Hemp

According to experts in the field, hemp is “one of the best” crops for “phytoremediation” – using plants to clean up toxic pollution in soil. (265) Hemp was one of the crops used to help clean up Chernobyl. (266) Research should be focused on finding a way to grow a hemp crop to create ethanol and clean the soil at the same time. One day, the radioactive metals could be separated from the fuel, and farmers will clean the soil while making a profit with free-from-radiation fuel crops. This is already being discussed as a possibility, but so far the author has not seen the technology manifest into reality. (267) Sunflowers, field mustard, amaranthus and cockscomb are other plants good for phytoremediation. (268)

Cleaning Up The Soil Part 2 – Fungi

Another option for soil remediation is fungi – or “mycoremediation”. The world’s leading expert on the subject – Paul Stamets – came up with this eight-point plan to respond to the Fukushima disaster:

1) Evacuate the region around the reactors. 

2) Establish a high-level, diversified remediation team including foresters, mycologists, nuclear and radiation experts, government officials, and citizens. 

3) Establish a fenced off Nuclear Forest Recovery Zone. 

4) Chip the wood debris from the destroyed buildings and trees and spread throughout areas suffering from high levels of radioactive contamination.  

5) Mulch the landscape with the chipped wood debris to a minimum depth of 12 – 24 inches. 

6) Plant native deciduous and conifer trees, along with hyper-accumulating mycorrhizal mushrooms, particularly Gomphidius glutinosus, Craterellus tubaeformis, and Laccaria amethystina (all native to pines). G. glutinosus has been reported to absorb – via the mycelium – and concentrate radioactive Cesium 137 more than 10,000-fold over ambient background levels. Many other mycorrhizal mushroom species also hyper-accumulate.  

7) Wait until mushrooms form and then harvest them under Radioactive HAZMAT protocols. 

8)  Continuously remove the mushrooms, which have now concentrated the radioactivity, particularly Cesium 137, to an incinerator. Burning the mushroom will result in radioactive ash. This ash can be further refined and the resulting concentrates vitrified (placed into glass) or stored using other state-of-the-art storage technologies.” (269)

Will this work? Who knows? It seems to be a lot more reasonable than what the Japanese are currently doing with the radioactive pollution.

The Topic Of Cancer

Once we’ve begun to replace nuclear power and clean the soil, we will still have to survive all the radiation that is currently floating around in our environment. As it turns out, many of the medicinal elements in cannabis are some of the most effective anti-cancer agents known. According to research done by Rob Callaway in a yet to be published work, cannabis has been found to be effective in wide range of cancers;

Multiple animal and preclinical studies, as well as a few case and/or pilot studies strongly suggest that cannabinoids are cancer fighting agents for a wide range of cancers, including breast carcinoma (Cafferal et al., 2010; Cafferal, Sarrió, Palacios, Guzmán, & Sánchez, 2006; De Petrocellis et al., 1998; Ligresti et al., 2006; McAllister, Christian, Horowitz, Garcia, & Desprez, 2007), prostate cancer (Mimeault, Pommery, Wattez, Bailly, & Hénichart, 2003; Ruiz, Miguel, & Diaz-Laviada, 1999; Sarfaraz, Afaq, Adhami, & Muhktar, 2005), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Carracedo et al., 2006; Michalski et al., 2008), colorectal carcinoma (Patsos et al., 2005), skin carcinoma (Casanova et al., 2003), neuroblastoma (Guzmán, 2003), lung carcinoma (Guzmán, 2003; Preet, Ganju, & Groopman, 2008), uterus carcinoma (Guzmán, 2003), oral cancer (Whyte et al., 2010), cervical carcinoma (Ramer & Hinz, 2008), lymphoma (Gustafsson, Christensson, Sander, & Flygare, 2006; Gustafsson et al., 2008), gliomas (Blázquez et al., 2003; Blázquez et al., 2004; Galve-Roperh et al., 2000; Guzmán et al., 2006; Massi et al., 2004; Sánchez, Galve-Roperh, Canova, Brachet, & Guzmán, 1998), leukemia cells (Jia et al., 2006; Powles et al., 2005), and biliary tract cancers (Leelawat, Leelawat, Narong, & Matangkasombut, 2010). In fact, the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that the cannabinoids have anticancer properties, with hundreds of peer-reviewed studies to date demonstrating these effects (see http://www.cannabisscience.com/ for a list of over 800 peer-reviewed cannabis and cancer references). (270)

Callaway also points out that, due to pressure from elite groups, human studies of cannabis as a treatment for cancer have been kept to a minimum. Reports of effective treatment of cancer with cannabis have been mostly confined to anecdotes from medical marijuana activists and their customers. (271) But more and more doctors are speaking out against the common practice of ignoring anecdotal evidence in favor of waiting on studies that are never given the go-ahead.

One doctor recently stated;

… it is not reasonable to suggest that the observations of doctors and patients are less reliable than clinical trial evidence. (272)

Another stated;

… the medical profession has a tendency to discard out of hand, and disparagingly, ‘anecdotal’ information. Digitalis, morphine, atropine, and the like are chemical derivatives that stem from anecdotal folklore remedies. After all, one anecdote may be a fable, but 1,000 anecdotes can be a bibliography. … A vital function of the medical profession is to sift the anecdotes and submit them, if possible, to scientific evaluation. But it all starts as anecdote. (273)

And yet another stated:

“As Louis Lasangna, M.D., has pointed out, controlled experiments were not needed to recognize the therapeutic potential of chloral hydrate, barbiturates, aspirin, curare, insulin or penicillin. He asks why regulators are now willing to accept the experiences of physicians and patients as evidence of adverse effects but not as evidence of therapeutic effects. (274)

Even the US Federal Government has taken note of the anecdotal evidence. Their National Cancer Institute reported that cannabis is an effective treatment for some types of cancers. (275) This appears to be a change from previous years, when the NCI was reluctant to admit what they apparently knew about cannabis’s anti-tumor effects. (276)

Old School Greed

Even the US Patent office has granted a patent to GW Pharmaceuticals – business partners with Bayer – for phytocannabinoids in the treatment of cancer. (277) It’s a special kind of greed that would patent a natural, grow-it-in-your-backyard yet-still-illegal cure for cancer. This type of greed harkens back to the time of James the First of England, when patents were granted for all sorts of common things – like salt, for example. Due to the predictable uproar, King James had to revoke all the “discovery-type” patents and limit patents for “projects of new invention” only. (278) If only that limit had remained.

Both of the most well-known and well-studied cannabinoids, THC (279) and CBD (280), are involved in the shrinking of tumors, as well as some of the “terpenes” or “volatile oils” found in cannabis such as myrcene and pinene. (281)

Other Helpful Effects

Cannabis also provides an anti-nauseant or “anti-emetic” effect (282) that helps those undergoing chemotherapy to maintain a more normal existence, as well as an appetite-stimulation effect – “the munchies” – essential for surviving both conventional and alternative cancer treatments. (283) An excellent film on the subject of how useful cannabis can be to treat cancer, What if Cannabis Cured Cancer, is now online. (284)

There are also indications that certain herbs, (285) mushrooms, (286) and vegetables (287) are useful in the fight against cancer.

And the number one food to aid in the combating of cancer? Hemp seed. It is the essential fatty acids found in hemp seed that give it the special healing powers that sets it apart from all other foods;

Hemp seed oil’s exceptional concentrations of EFAs (essential fatty acids) are what make it so special. In concept, this oil could provide all of our EFA necessities for life. Essential fatty acids are the omega fats that cannot be produced by the body and must be ingested. They are known for their role in preventing heart disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cancer, arthritis and much more. The seven-time Nobel Prize nominee, Dr. Johana Budwig, a pioneer of EFA research, reported success in treating heart infraction, arthritis, cancer, and other common diseases with massive doses of EFAs. (288)

Fungi Again

As it turns out, mushrooms – even magic mushrooms – are also being looked at for various forms of anti-cancer treatment. Psilocybin, from Psilocybe mushrooms, is being investigated as a treatment for the depression that accompanies cancer treatment. (289) The famous red with white spots hallucinogenic mushroom Amanita Muscaria has a reputation as a folk medicine to treat cancer with. (290) Even the poisonous Amanita phalloides – or “death cap” mushroom – is being investigated as a potential cure for cancer. (291)

By criminalizing naturally-occurring poisons, we risk losing our chance to transform them into medicines. As Casanova wisely pointed out; “In wise hands poison is medicine. In foolish hands medicine is poison.”

How to Save The Future

There’s been a quantum leap technologically in our age, but unless there’s another quantum leap in human relations, unless we learn to live in a new way towards one another, there will be a catastrophe.

– Albert Einstein

In this world there is room for everyone. And the good earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men’s souls …

– Charles Chaplain, The Great Dictator, 1940 (293)

Extinction-Level Greed

It’s that very special kind of greed – a greed that is a modern-day variation of the “let’s patent salt” greed, let’s call it “monopoly capitalism” for lack of a better term – that puts everyone’s life at risk. Everyone on earth. Everyone including the monopoly capitalists, and their children and grandchildren. It manifests into slavery and war profiteering and nearly every large-scale evil in the world.

It has grown bigger and more dangerous throughout history. It resulted in a series of acts by the English Parliament that attempted to make the American colonies artificially dependent on England for goods; an attempt that backfired into the American Revolution. (294) It resulted in an attempt by England to monopolize the sale of salt in India, which again backfired into independence for India. (295)

It resulted in the Flexner Report shutting down the herbal medicine schools, (296) in hemp being outlawed in North America, (297) in the trolley (298) and electric car (299) being killed, in herbs rarely being covered under public healthcare programs or health insurance, (300) in some people trying to set up a marijuana monopoly today (301) and in the red tape surrounding the growing of industrial hemp while massive subsidies go to oil, gas and nuclear energy. (302)

It’s not the voice of the people saying “how can I make a decent living? How can I feed my family and put my kids through school?”; rather, it’s the voice of absolute greed saying “how can I make all the money. How can I make a killing?”

Oh how I wish the greed of today – the current flavor of greed that has the rulers of the world tightly in it’s grip – would backfire into a global revolution that turns the political system of every country into a mixture of Switzerland’s and Nunavut’s, where the entire planet could practice direct democracy and consensus decision-making through proportionally-elected representatives while at the same time limiting the power of (and rendering more accountable) the captains of industry that keep fucking up the environment and starting wars over and over and over again.

100 years ago it was just the risk of starvation and dying in wars (wars that were themselves efforts to take over land and resources while selling weapons, fuel and other war-materials at marked-up prices) that put all our lives at risk. But today’s greed has also manifested in types of pollution – radiation, oil spills, greenhouse gasses, etc. – that put our very lives at risk regardless of where we live or what we do for a living.

Unless we find the courage to replace monopoly capitalism with some form of enhanced cooperation and harmony, unless we replace the race to the finish line with an effort to get everyone over the finish line, we will end up dying out as a species. Dying of our own hubris, short sightedness and greed.

Simple Adjustments

The changes we need to make are relatively simple. First off, we must end the division between “medical” and “recreational” cannabis users. Given the facts that

1) cannabis can banish depression, remove stress and shrink tumors and

2) there’s a lot of stressful and/or depressing situations everyone must navigate and plenty of radiation floating around in this world, I think we can safely say that cannabis is a preventive herbal medicine for everyone – those who are sick, and those who wish to remain healthy. Every user is a medical user – some just use it for preventive medicine. Everyone is legit – doctor’s note or not.

Moreover, we must switch over from the synthetic ways to the natural ones, from non-renewable to renewable energy. We must research natural methods of cleaning up our messes and applying those methods to where we made our nuclear mistakes. We must invest in things that can’t (or shouldn’t) be patented – such as cannabis medicines, renewable energies, public transportation, bioremediation of the soil – but that might still be the best solution for cancer and radiation sickness. We must grow hemp and mushrooms everywhere, without all the red tape of the current hemp bureaucracy and hemp seed monopoly, to clean the soil and to bring the price down on hemp ethanol and hemp food.

This may be achieved by educating the population of the world as to the advantages of making such changes. It will also take switching over from an economic system that rewards individuals who amass great wealth despite irresponsible and horrific behavior, to one which rewards individuals who amass great reputations from contributing good things to society regardless of personal wealth.

We need to, in MLK Jr.’s words, learn to “walk the Earth as brothers and sisters”, to truly share economic and political power rather than to pretend to share these powers while continuing to live as rulers and livestock. It seems like the only way the human race will survive.

[…]

(Read the full article and view the list of sources at Cannabis Culture)

Read “Part 1: What Happened?”.

Read “Part 2: Global Consequences”.

Read “Part 3: The Dangers of Nuclear Power”.

Read “Part 4: Other Sources of Dangerous Radiation”.

—-
Alternative Free Press – fair use –

Brain ‘15-second delay’ shields us from hallucinogenic experience

Brain ‘15-second delay’ shields us from hallucinogenic experience – research

RT: April 7, 2014

Scientists have revealed the human brain has a 15-second lag that helps stabilize incoming visual information, which we don’t notice bombarding us in the course of our everyday lives.

Eyes tend to receive an enormous information load from dusk till dawn, and as one opens his or her eyes in the morning, the brain starts its intensive work, processing incoming pictures from the surroundings, including imagery from TV screens and computer monitors.

A team of vision scientists at the University of California, Berkeley and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) revealed this secret of the human brain: To save us from insanity induced by a constantly changing torrent of pictures, shapes and colors – both virtual and real world – the brain filters out information, failing in most cases to notice small changes in a 15-second period of time.

It actually means that what we do see is, in fact, a mixture of past and present. According to the research, published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, stability is attained at the expense of accuracy.

“What you are seeing at the present moment is not a fresh snapshot of the world but rather an average of what you’ve seen in the past 10 to 15 seconds,” said study author Jason Fischer, Ph.D., a neuroscientist at MIT.

The discovery, called a continuity field, at first seems to be yet another optical illusion, good to explain why we miss errors in film editing.

“The continuity field smoothes what would otherwise be a jittery perception of object features over time,” said David Whitney, associate professor of psychology at UC Berkeley and senior author of the study. “Essentially, it pulls together physically but not radically different objects to appear more similar to each other. This is surprising because it means the visual system sacrifices accuracy for the sake of the continuous, stable perception of objects.”

However, according to the scientists, a continuity field is an advantageous mechanism, as it excludes visual ‘noise’. “The changes that continuity fields cause us to miss are most often unimportant,” Fischer said.

What is more, without such brain development humans would find the world an unsteady and frightening place to be. It might be similar to a person on hallucinogenic drugs experiencing sudden changes of color, a play of shadows and splashes of light. It would be just too overwhelming to live like this on a daily basis – a severe ordeal for the psyche.

“This is the brain’s way of reducing the number of things we have to deal with in the visual environment,” said psychologist Aaron Johnson of Concordia University in Montreal; he was not involved in the study, but was interested in its results. “If we were sensitive to every little change, our brains probably couldn’t cope.”

(Read the full article at RT)

—-
Alternative Free Press – fair use –

Police Major Argues The Case Against Prohibition

The Case Against Prohibition

By Mjr. Neill Franklin (Ret.)
Law Officer: March 31, 2014

Before Nixon declared the war on drugs in the early 1970s, policing was a different creature altogether. Police were the “good guys” going after the “bad guys”–the rapists, the murderers, the child molesters–most people could agree society was better without. Since that time, the very nature of policing has changed.

Today enforcing drug laws not only occupies a huge portion of police time, it forms much of the identity of the profession and of individual officers who dedicate their lives to serving the public. That’s why, to me, the finding that more officers support the legalization of marijuana possession than support the status quo is remarkable. Who among us questions such things lightly?

But in other ways, this finding is unsurprising. I have always believed that those in the trenches were those most privy to the injustice and the illogic of the war on drugs, and, I hope, those most dedicated to righting this wrong. Who better to question its results? That so many officers were brave enough to challenge the prohibition of marijuana–one of the pillars upon which their professional identity is founded–is an act of honor for the love of the profession of which I am so proud to have been a part for more than three decades.

I commend Law Officer for conducting this study, but I find that the questions they didn’t ask are the ones most relevant to the average officer: Will the legalization of marijuana and other drugs lead to a reduction in the power of street gangs and cartels that terrorize our cities? Will it allow police officers to focus greater attention on violent crimes and restore good relations with the communities in which they operate? Ultimately, will it lead to less violence?

I believe that most officers brave enough to be honest with themselves about the answers can only answer in the affirmative to these questions. We are the ones who see–every day–that the prohibition of drugs, just like the prohibition of alcohol, is what provides the tremendous profits to the criminal organizations that provide the drugs on our streets. That picking up the petty drug dealer on the corner–the kinds of arrest that federal grants and asset forfeiture laws incentivize–does nothing to affect the long-term supply of drugs and only causes more violence as rival gangs battle to fill power vacuums. That all of this has caused society generally and our communities of color specifically to look upon us as people to be feared rather than as public servants advancing public safety, and that that distrust, far from being merely an abstract concept, makes our jobs infinitely more difficult as community members shy from cooperating in investigations.

The majority of the populace have the privilege of rarely having to think about these harsh realities of the drug war, but police are uniquely positioned to see the ravages caused by prohibition firsthand. That is why those who favor legalizing, decriminalizing or legalizing medical marijuana outnumber those who don’t two to one in this survey. Still, in the culture of the blue wall of silence, their willingness to dissent speaks volumes about their daring and fortitude.

I now ask that these officers brave enough to question the prohibition of marijuana one day cast the same critical eye on the prohibition of other drugs. Regulation and control doesn’t mean that heroin will be available at the neighborhood convenience store or even in stores dedicated to the purpose. It simply means that governments, rather than criminals, will decide who gets to buy what where and when.

That could mean only providing addicts with maintenance doses such as Switzerland has done. It could mean restricting all advertising. It could mean supervised injection sites. It could mean expanded prevention programs that show the real hazards of drug abuse and look less like rock stars “burning out” and more like the sad reality of addiction we as law enforcement officials see every day.

Think of the first person you think of when you think of addiction. Now imagine if every kid with too much to lose thought of that person rather than (who’s a cool drug user to kids these days?) when they thought of drug use. Think of if we were able to take away the mystique of the forbidden and replace it with a pity for the pathetic–not through misinformation and lies but through an honest look at addiction as a public health problem to be addressed, not as a criminal justice matter to be swept under the rug.

Now imagine we could also replace the dealer who would sell to kids with a regulated and licensed businessperson who would never dare. That we could separate the markets so that the person who buys marijuana isn’t encouraged to try cocaine. Legalization and regulation is not a radical argument. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. Its point is to make the exotic mundane.

Of course, it is a radical argument to the criminal syndicates who rely on drug profits to fund every other criminal enterprise. And, unfortunately, it’s a radical argument to those policing associations who make billions on asset forfeitures and federal grants designed to get them focused on drug crime rather than on the real work of policing. The only question is: Which is more important to you? The dictates of the drug war, or doing what is best for the community you’re sworn to serve and protect?

(Read the full article at Law Officer)

—-
Alternative Free Press

Cannabis Kills Cancer

AlternativeFreePress.com

Cancer hates marijuana. Here is definitive proof via peer-reviewed science that cannabis kills cancer, many different types of cancer.

Cannabis kills stomach cancer
These results indicate that a cannabinoid agonist may, indeed, be an alternative chemotherapeutic agent for 5-FU-resistant gastric cancer.
Anticancer Research. 2013 June. ‘Cannabinoid receptor agonist as an alternative drug in 5-fluorouracil-resistant gastric cancer cells.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23749906

Cannabis kills leukemia
We explored the activity of six cannabinoids, used both alone and in combination in leukaemic cells. Cannabinoids were cytostatic and caused a simultaneous arrest at all phases of the cell cycle. Re-culturing pre-treated cells in drug-free medium resulted in dramatic reductions in cell viability. Furthermore, combining cannabinoids was not antagonistic.
Anticancer Research October 2013 ‘Enhancing the Activity of Cannabidiol and Other Cannabinoids In Vitro Through Modifications to Drug Combinations and Treatment Schedules
http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/33/10/4373.abstract#corresp-1

Cannabis kills breast cancer
Here, we have shown CBD-induced cell death of breast cancer cells, independent of cannabinoid and vallinoid receptor activation. […] Our study revealed an intricate interplay between apoptosis and autophagy in CBD-treated breast cancer cells and highlighted the value of continued investigation into the potential use of CBD as an antineoplastic agent.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 July Cannabidiol induces programmed cell death in breast cancer cells by coordinating the cross-talk between apoptosis and autophagy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21566064

Cannabis kills colon cancer
CBD BDS attenuates colon carcinogenesis and inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation via CB1 and CB2 receptor activation. The results may have some clinical relevance for the use of Cannabis-based medicines in cancer patients.
Phytomedicine. 2013 December ‘Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373545

Cannabis kills prostate cancer
several cannabinoids exert antitumoral properties against prostate cancer, reducing xenograft prostate tumor growth, prostate cancer cell proliferation and cell migration.
Nat Rev Urol. September 2011 ‘The endocannabinoid system in prostate cancer.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912423

Cannabis kills brain cancer
New research out of Spain suggests that THC — the active ingredient in marijuana — appears to prompt the death of brain cancer cells.
ABC News ‘Active Ingredient in Marijuana Kills Brain Cancer Cells
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Healthday/story?id=7235037&page=1

Dr. Confirms Cannabis Oil Cures Brain Tumor & Brain Cancer

Cannabis kills cancer & curbs MS
“The cannabinoids in cannabis prevent cancer cells from spreading, and they contribute to cancer cell death because they hit some receptors that are generally up-regulated in cancer cells,” says Professor Marja Jäättelä, who heads the Cell Death and Metabolism Research Unit at the Danish Cancer Society.
ScienceNordic: January 6, 2014 ‘Cannabis can kill cancer cells and curb MS
http://sciencenordic.com/cannabis-can-kill-cancer-cells-and-curb-ms

Dr. Christina Sanchez (a molecular biologist at Compultense University in Madrid, Spain) explains how THC kills cancer cells.

Endocannabinoid system can improve efficacy of colon cancer treatments
Our results partially elucidated the role of endocannabinoid system in the molecular mechanisms enrolled by steroids in the inhibition of colon cancer cell growth and strongly suggested that targeting the endocannabinoid system could represent a promising tool to improve the efficacy of colorectal cancer treatments.
Journal of Cellular Physiology January 2012 ‘Interaction of endocannabinoid system and steroid Hormones in the control of colon cancer cell growth
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcp.22727/abstract

Endocannabinoid system promising target to treat cancer
The antiproliferative and apoptotic effects produced by some of these pharmacological probes reveal that the endocannabinoid system is a promising new target for the development of novel chemotherapeutics to treat cancer.
Cancer Metastasis 2011 December Cannabinoids, endocannabinoids, and cancer.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22038019

Cannabinoids are an anti-cancer
cannabinoids have shown some promise as anti-cancer therapies.
Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology October 2011 The intersection between cannabis and cancer in the United States.
http://www.croh-online.com/article/S1040-8428%2811%2900231-9/fulltext#sec0055

Cannabis kills skin cancer

Cannabis kills pancreatic cancer
Cannabinoids also reduced the growth of tumor cells in two animal models of pancreatic cancer.
Cancer Res July 2006 Cannabinoids Induce Apoptosis of Pancreatic Tumor Cells via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress–Related Genes
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/66/13/6748.abstract

Cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 target for melanoma treatment
WIN exerted antimitogenic effects […] Membrane lipid raft complex-mediated antimitogenic effect of WIN in melanoma could represents a potential targets for a melanoma treatment.
Cancer Lett. 2011 November The antimitogenic effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 on human melanoma cells is mediated by the membrane lipid raft
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21807457

Cannabis kills oral cancer
These results show the cannabinoids are potent inhibitors of Tu183 cellular respiration and are toxic to this highly malignant tumor.
Pharmacology June 2010 Cannabinoids inhibit cellular respiration of human oral cancer cells.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20516734

Smoking cannabis can prevent neck and head cancer
Our study suggests that moderate marijuana use is associated with reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 August A population-based case-control study of marijuana use and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18312888

Can cannabis cure cancer? The big pharmaceutical companies & many governments say no. In fact, the US government ridiculously claims that cannabis has no medicinal value. This asinine government position has killed innocent people including 4 year old Cash Hyde.

PRweb reported about Cash Hyde’s death back in 2012:

The four-year-old Montana boy—whose malignant brain cancer had been in remission while he received consistent medical cannabis treatments—is the latest casualty in the federal government’s war on voter-approved medical marijuana […] Desperate to find anything to keep their young child Cash alive, after traditional treatments and medications failed to slow the growth of the malignant tumor in his brain, Mike and Kalli Hyde turned to high-CBD cannabis oil. Cash’s cancer immediately went into remission, and he started to live a more normal life. Cash was comfortable, started eating again, and recovered his desire to play. A news story about Cash can be viewed on YouTube.

Then, last summer, law enforcement officials in Montana came down hard on the medical marijuana industry. Rather than face the risk of being stormed by armed agents and subjected to steep fines or jail time, many legally-compliant medical cannabis dispensaries in Montana closed down.

The federal crackdown resulted in the closure of most of the medical marijuana dispensaries in Montana, and cut off the Hyde’s access to the therapeutic cannabis oil that was keeping Cash’s cancer at bay. Once Cash’s medication was cut off, his cancer came back out of remission.

Does prohibition kill children? Yes, definitely yes.

Does cannabis kill cancer? Yes, definitely yes.

Written by Alternative Free Press
Creative Commons License
Cannabis Kills Cancer by AlternativeFreePress.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How much does the war on drugs cost you?

Jason Reed, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Politics.co.uk: March 26, 2014

Vienna recently played host to the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND), but the tone of this year’s event was noticeably different to previous sessions.

For many years the dialogue of ‘to legalise or not to legalise’ has been wholly hypothetical and taboo, but this year saw Uruguay nail its colours firmly to the mast by being the first state to fully regulate their cannabis market. This is in breach of the 1961 Single Convention, which is often viewed upon as set in stone, unremitting in its gospel rule over global drug policies.

Uruguay held fast to their rudder and steered their ship through choppy waters; the metaphor seems all the more applicable as it was more than suggested that Uruguay are now pirates in the hostile seas of the UN single convention.

In contrast to the Latin American state’s emboldened position on cannabis, the US was more notable in its silence. Usually one of the more dictatorial participants, the US seemingly handed the baton over to Russia to assert the enforcement tone of the CND. It doesn’t take much to see why the US took more of a backseat when Colorado and Washington, two states that have also fully commercially legalised cannabis, act as very large elephants in the UN’s designated room of conformity.

As delegates attended Vienna, a more domestic issue became ripe for debate, with the emergence of a cannabis café proposal for Thanet in Kent. A tale of a few cities presents itself.

As the smoke clears, what can we learn from the polarised models of cannabis regulation? And what can this imply for the UK’s necessary debate on cannabis reforms?
If we compare the antipodal cannabis models of Uruguay and Colorado, we soon see a picture emerge.

Uruguay reformed, somewhat unpopularly, based on their need to hinder and restrict trafficking routes given their geographic turbulence in being situated in a narco-region. Polls showed that the electorate were not in favour of legalising cannabis, but with the strong leadership of Nobel Peace Prize nominee, President José Mujica, the country embarked on the regulation of their cannabis supply to roadblock cartels and traffickers.

The state-run cannabis model will undercut the illicit trade’s price: the street market sells cannabis at $1.40 (85p) a gram, with the government proposing to sell at $1 (60p). This is intelligent taxation in action and only possible through regulatory methods.

Uruguay plans to sell five commercial cannabis strains, each with ‘genetic fingerprints’ so as to allow the ability to trace the product. Only a handful of commercial companies will be allowed to produce cannabis, which will then, essentially, be handed back to the state for distribution.

If we now look at Colorado, we see that the US has taken a more liberal stance and allowed commercialisation to play a part. Critics do worry that aggressive marketing could play a detrimental role in Colorado’s model, and this may have an effect as more states begin to fully regulate their cannabis supply.

What does spring out of Colorado’s model is that of the numbers: in the first month of commercial sales, the state collected $2 million (£1.21 million) in ‘recreational’ sales alone, with the tally rising to $3.2 million (£1.93 million) with existing medical marijuana dispensaries factored in.

What we have to be clear on is that Colorado remains a moving target, subject to copious amounts of caveats, but we can look at some forecasts to spot an interesting fiscal picture that’s now emerging. It’s estimated that cannabis outlets will take in around $750 million (£453 million) to $1 billion (£600 million) in the coming fiscal year, with tax adding $65 million (£39 million) – $125 million (£75 million) to the state’s coffers.

The proposal is that the tax revenue goes towards building schools, and more notably, investment into teen rehab and addiction programmes. Colorado’s crop forecasts also tell an interesting tale, with cannabis projected to be the third most valuable crop for the fiscal year of 2014-15: corn $947 million (£572 million), hay $863 million (£521 million), cannabis $777 million (£469 million).

Opponents of reform are hailing the tax projections as insignificant compared to previous promises; this cynical angle is simply no-win spin. If revenue streams came in at more than original estimates, then it would have been a certainty that an increase in usage would have been cited as a detrimental effect and then used as leverage by those that still wish for cannabis to remain a prohibited substance.

Turning attention towards our domestic picture, let’s assess how the UK fares on the numbers. Well, it’s not pretty, and anyone with a keenness for prudence should brace themselves. Each UK taxpayer spends £400 a year on maintaining our current drug policy; we can perhaps liken this number to a UK drug policy tax.

If we break things down further then we see that the costs to the police – on cannabis laws alone – stand at around £500 million. With the onset of ever more sophisticated methods and techniques in domestic cultivation, we could conceivably see this half a billion price tag inflate over the coming years. If we allow ourselves to explore our own regulatory models then recent research from the Institute for Social and Economic Research indicates that a reformed and regulated cannabis market in England and Wales could cut the deficit by £1.2 billion – and this is a conservative estimate.

It has been trumpeted that the use of cannabis is on the decline in the UK. This is a slightly disingenuous point given that an influx of ‘legal highs’, or New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), have taken a foothold in the UK consumer market and distorts accuracy.

With suitable scepticism over the use of cannabis falling we must also look at the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) figures for cannabis farms which has seen a 15% increase in domestic farms with 3,032 in 2008 compared to 7,865 in 2011. This is by no means a metric of success that our drug laws are working by way of enforcement.

(View the full article including links to sources at at Politics.co.uk)

Jason Reed is executive director Law Enforcement Against Prohibition UK (Leap UK). Leap is a global, UN-accredited organization of senior police and enforcement personnel who advocate health and regulatory alternatives to punitive drug laws.

—-
AlternativeFreePress.com

Students who use cannabis do better at school than cigarette smokers

Pot-smoking students better at school than ‘marginalized’ tobacco-smoking peers

Andrea Janus
CTV : March 25, 2014

Students who only smoke marijuana do better at school than classmates who smoke just tobacco, or who smoke both tobacco and pot, says a new study, which tracked substance use among teens over 30 years.

Researchers from the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health analyzed data from a survey administered to nearly 39,000 Ontario students between 1981 and 2011. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health asked students in Grades 7, 9 and 11 about their tobacco and marijuana use, and their academic performance.

The study found that marijuana-only users did better at school than their counterparts who smoked only cigarettes or who smoked both cigarettes and marijuana. However, the findings reflect the fact that fewer students smoke tobacco today compared to 30 years ago, and those that do make up a very “marginalized, vulnerable” population, says lead study author Michael Chaiton, assistant professor in epidemiology and public health policy.

About 92 per cent of tobacco users also use marijuana, the study found. However, only 25 per cent of marijuana uses also smoke tobacco.

“It’s better relatively,” Chaiton says of marijuana-only users’ academic performance.

(Read the full article at CTV)

—-
AlternativeFreePress.com

Colorado Approves Retroactive Legalization of Cannabis Possession

AlternativeFreePress.com

The Colorado Court of Appeals has ruled that citizens convicted of cannabis possession prior to legalization may now be eligible to have those decisions overturned.

Colorado’s Constitution’s recently passed Amendment 64 says adults are legally allowed to buy up to one ounce of cannabis, but left previously convicted cannabis users in jail. However, on March 13, Colorado’s appeals panel said that part of an earlier decision in a 2011 case for cannabis possession should be vacated.

The judges found that “Amendment 64, by decriminalizing the personal use or possession of one ounce or less of marijuana, meets the statutory requirement for ‘a significant change in the law’ and eliminates and thus mitigates the penalties for persons convicted of engaging in such conduct,” and the law “applies retroactively to defendants whose convictions under those provisions were subject to appeal or postconviction motion on the effective date of the amendment.”

The ruling only applies to those convicted of possessing one ounce or less.

Written by Alternative Free Press
Creative Commons License
Colorado Approves Retroactive Legalization of Cannabis Possession by AlternativeFreePress.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sources for this article:
1. Division I Opinion by JUDGE MILLER Taubman and Lichtenstein, JJ., concur http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/Opinion/2014/11CA1929-PD.pdf

2. Colo. Court Rules Some Marijuana Convictions Can Be Overturned http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/03/13/289961369/colo-court-rules-some-marijuana-convictions-can-be-overturned